I think about it for a while 'I do it more and more I am convinced that the era of Web 2.0, has run Féisbuc ate \u200b\u200bit all and is stoned a lot of people who do not belong to the digital generation that knows how to use all' ste robe (I included).
Once there were blogs and myspace. The first was for those who wanted to communicate through words, the latter for those who want to do it with images, videos and more. The first were simple, clean, the latter a bit 'messy but creative, and often exaggerated tamarri.
should be noted that, with a little effort, both instruments were customized and that was enough to learn how to insert a few lines of code in the template html to get results a certain level. Personally, being a lazy from international competition, I never did and I'm decently satisfied with what I was made available, at least until the arrival of Féisbuc.
I do not remember who invited me to use it, but I remember distinctly that I received an email in which the current unknown (or unknown) advised me to try it. It is now several years that abuse and I passed all the stages of addiction, but now, finally, I feel very strong desire to get rid of it at least in part.
I do not want to quibble about the value of social networks, but I think that, in principle, can make sense in America, a country where people move more, the distances are huge and where contacts with "friends" get lost easily. For us it is an unnecessary terrifying. This is not necessarily a bad thing because as I read somewhere, "the total uselessness in its free innocent, it's really hard to get to, and when it happens, it produces beauty." Ok. Points of view. But art itself is useless. E Bella (Twilight not demented). FB
its usefulness has it and is certainly not about getting in touch with people that if you if you missed the street, there must be a reason the state. Also because with people who regularly attend one feels by phone or by mail at most as it was once. NOTE: "once" I mean 2003, not 1000 years ago ...
FB In the pre-Internet stuff was interesting after all. It is "surfing, you look for information, you fools discovered sites and wonderful, you run into such phenomena as Rotten.com or nell'Hokuto Audiotec (RIP) that allows you to put on the phone Abadantuono version of Attila, they tried free porn ( followed by a piece on YouPorn) and ICQ chat with web ... But that is today called "uber old" also allows you to build a representation of self, identity choice and assembled by the user. It matters little that it was phony or real, but ... I always thought those were more interesting because you think artificial, constructed, narrated, because behind the fact that one said to be world champion "snookerina Breton" (fuck-that I invented yet) had a brain work, as short and buggy.
FB, however, is the total nullification of creativity and the glorification of laziness. We find links that identify our emotional state, quotations, cartoons, photos, pictures, games of all kinds, all without sail, without going to try anything, or even worse, without creating anything of our own. The best effort is going on YouTube, but if a friend of ours has posted what interests us, is not even necessary, just share it from him ... and then you quit more FBs, no longer used the Net
All this, I think, is quite disheartening because the Internet has taught something to someone, is that it is a huge space in which to express a total and absolute freedom, unless you're not Chinese. Ok, seen in context that there are around a lot ': unless you're not Chinese and you live in China. Frankly, I find it very creative my posts from the supermarket and I very much appreciate the opportunity to share them instantly by generating a reaction, ma penso anche che questo sovraccarico di informazioni assolutamente inutili come le mie foto a Hello-aiuto-è-proprio-ovunque-Kitty, non valga un cazzo e che sia un assoluto nulla in espansione di “funzione fatica” – vedi le teorie sulla comunicazione del linguista Jakobson.
Insomma, parlo anche se non ho una beata da dire e lo faccio solo per affermare la mia presenza, tenere vivo un contatto. Visto che oggi ho mangiato semplice (panino con la bologna) mi viene un dubbio feroce: non è che FB è cresciuto così tanto perché consente di controllare le persone? Ok, sul Corriere di oggi c’è un articolo nel quale si dice che i detenuti di Napoli comunicano con l’esterno grazie a delle pagine FB and so it is clear that the control is not absolute, but the profiling is real, just look at the ads ...
Before I get engaged, for example, on my page was advertising for a cartload pussy, now insist on sell me the terrifying kimono with flowers. Got to do something? I do not know if you read and ask questions, remember the title of this post.
in favor of the control theory I found, among many other crap I read about FB, even those who argue that the statistics they see the traffic of FB than porn sites, that social networks are a new instrument of control and repression, as a specie di bromuro virtuale. A me sembra una stronzata grossa come la piramide di Cheope che si spiega da sola.
Detto questo, ho il dubbio che il mio amico Enfisema abbia fatto benissimo a non aprire un profilo.
Detto questo, linko il post a FB.
Ma lo faccio da FUORI, per leggerlo sei uscito da FB, occhio a non prendere freddo.
0 comments:
Post a Comment