Long Dong Silver Wacht Free Movie

The role of 'England and Anglicanism in the history of modern Catholicism and bioethics ... The Pope

King Henry VIII's infamous ...

Queen Elizabeth I bloody ..

John Henry Cardinal Newman was created May 12, 1879 by Leo XIII. For the assignment of the cardinal's hat, Newman wrote what is known to history as the "Business Speech" an amazing poster of Western civilization, a perfect X-ray of secularizing culture and mentality, where it was identified apostasy.

------------------------------------------ ------

recent article on religious freedom from the message for World Day of Peace by His Holiness Benedict XVI:

I urge, then, men and women good will to renew its commitment to build a world where all are free to practice their own religion or belief. This doctrine is contrary the "Syllabus of Errors" of Pope Pius IX ... The man is not free to profess a faith that does not save the soul.

---------------------------------------------- ---

"Thank you, Excellency, for participation in the high honor that the Holy Father has deigned to confer upon my humble person [words of Newman in Italian], and if I ask permission to continue my speech is not in your language so musical, but in my beloved mother tongue, this is because I can better express what I hear the announcement that she told me. Let me begin by expressing astonishment and deep gratitude that I felt and still feel magnanimity and love for the Holy Father for having chosen to such a huge honor. It was really a big surprise. It had never occurred to me to be worthy of it and it seemed so at odds with the story of my life. I had to go through many trials, but now approaching the end of everything, I felt at peace. However, is it not possible that I have lived so many years just to see this day? Difficult even to think how I could deal with such an emotion if the Holy Father had not made a further gesture of generosity towards me, showing another side of his nature full of finesse and bontà.Egli sensed my confusion and wanted to explain why I had raised a great honor. Along with words of encouragement, told me that his decision was a recognition of my zeal and service that I had made for many years the Catholic Church, moreover, he was sure that the English Catholics, and even Protestant England would have welcomed the that I received a sign of his favor. After these kind words of His Holiness, I was just insensitive and ungrateful if I had still some hesitation. This he took care to tell me and what I want? In my long life I have committed many mistakes. I have nothing of that sublime perfection that is found in the writings of the saints, that is the absolute absence of errors. But what I think I can say about everything I wrote is this: my good intentions, the lack of personal purposes, the sense of obedience, a willingness to be corrected, the fear of making mistakes, the desire to serve the Holy Church, and only for God's mercy, some successo.E I am pleased to be able to add that I opposed from the start to a great disaster. For thirty, forty, fifty years I tried to fight with all my strength, the spirit of liberalism in religion. Never has the Holy Church has had the greatest need of someone who was opposed to more than today, when, alas! now this is a bug which stretches like a death trap on the whole earth, and on this occasion, so great for me, when it is natural for me to extend his eyes to the world, the Holy Church and its future, I hope it will not be considered unfortunate that I renew that sentence so often that I have already spoken. Liberalism in religion is the doctrine that there is no positive truth in religion, but a creed is as good as another, and this is a belief that every day acquires more credence and strength. It is against any recognition of a religion as true. It teaches that all must be tolerated, because all it is a matter of opinion. Revealed religion is not a truth, but a sentiment and a personal preference, not an objective fact or a miracle, and it is a right of every individual to make it say whatever strikes his fancy most.
Devotion is not necessarily founded on faith. You may attend the Protestant churches and Catholic Churches, both sit at the table and do not belong to any. You can fraternize and have spiritual thoughts and feelings in common, without even addressing the problem of a common doctrine or feel the need. Since then, religion is a characteristic so personal and so private a property, you should definitely ignore the relationships between people. If one changed religion every morning, what should you care? Investigate the religion of another is no less indiscreet that investigate its economic resources or their family life. Religion is not a glue of society. So far, the civil power was a Christian. Even in nations separated by the Church, as in mine, when I was young still worth the saying: "Christianity is the law of the country." Now this civil structure of society, which has been the creation of Christianity, is rejecting Christianity. That, and many others that followed, has disappeared or is disappearing, and by the end of the century, unless God intervenes, it will be forgotten. Until now it was thought that enough religion with its supernatural sanctions to ensure law and order to our population, now philosophers and politicians tend to solve this problem without the aid of Christianity. In place of authority and teaching of the Church, they claim first wholly secular education, designed to make it clear to every individual who ordered, industrious and sober back to his own advantage. Then they provide the major principles that must replace religion and the masses so that educators should follow the fundamental ethical truths in their broadest sense, justice, benevolence, honesty, etc..; experience and the natural laws that exist and act spontaneously in society and in social, physical and psychological, for example, in government, commerce, finance, health and the relations between nations. As for religion, it is a private luxury that one can afford, if you like, but obviously has to pay, and that it can not impose on others or practicing
annoy him. The general characteristics of this great apostasy are the same everywhere, but the details vary among countries. I will speak of my country because I know him better. I fear that it will have a large following here, even if you can not imagine how it will end. At first glance you might think that the British are too religious for a way of thinking that the rest of Europe appears to be based on atheism, but our misfortune is that, although, as elsewhere, leads to atheism, it is not born here necessarily atheism. It should be remembered that the religious sects, which appeared in England three centuries ago and today is so strong, they are fiercely opposed to the union of church and state and would like to de-Christianization of the monarchy and all its apparatus, arguing that such a catastrophe would make Christianity purer and stronger. The principle of liberalism, then, there arises under the same circumstances. Consider the consequences of all these sètte.Con all probability they represent the religion of half the population, and let's not forget that our government is a democracy. It is as if a dozen people at random on the street and they certainly have their share of power, they were up to seven religions diverse.Ora how they can find consensus for action on the local or national level when each is fighting for the recognition of one's religious denomination? Any decision would be blocked, unless the topic of religion is not entirely ignored. There's nothing else to do. And third, do not forget that in liberal thought there is much good and true, just mention, for example, the principles of justice, honesty, sobriety, self-control, kindness, as I noted above, are among its main principles are proclaimed and the natural laws of society. It is only when we realize that this bell'elenco diprincìpi is to set aside and completely erase the religion, we are forced to condemn liberalism. Indeed, there was never a plan of the enemy so cleverly engineered and greatest chance of success. And in fact, it is largely achieving its goals, attracting large numbers of men in their ranks capable, serious and honest, the elderly estimated, with long experience, and young beautiful speranze.Ecco how things are in England, and it is good that all we realize it, but I absolutely do not think he is scared. Of course I'm disappointed, because I think it could be detrimental to many souls, but I'm not afraid at all that it has the capability to prevent the victory of the Word of God, the Holy Church, our Almighty King, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, Faithful and True, and his Vicar on earth. Too often, Christianity is now found in what appeared to be a mortal danger, because now we have to scare the face of this new test. This is absolutely certain, but what is uncertain, and in these major challenges it usually is, and is usually a big surprise for everyone, is the way in which from time to time Providence protects and saves his elect. Sometimes the enemy becomes a friend, sometimes is stripped of its virulence and aggressiveness, sometimes it falls apart by itself, sometimes rages as required, to our advantage, then disappears. Normally, the Church must not do anything but continue to do what needs to be done, confidence and peace, be quiet and wait for the salvation of God "Gi meek shall inherit the earth and enjoy great peace" (Ps 37.11) . Mansueti hereditabunt Terram, Et delectabuntur pacis in multitude. "

                             

* * *
Nel 1877 Newman scrisse questa profetica e realistica riflessione:
«In questi cinquant’anni ho pensato che si stiano avvicinando tempi di diffusa infedeltà, e durante questi water year, in fact, have increased as those of a diluvio.Prevedo time after my death, in which you can only see the tops of the mountains, like islands in a vast sea. I refer mainly to the Protestant world, but the Catholic leaders will embark on major initiatives and achieve worthwhile goals, and will need much wisdom and great courage, if the Holy Church must be free of this terrible disaster, and although it falls on any test with her was only temporary, can be exceedingly harsh in its course "(Marín JM, John Henry Newman.'s life (1801-1890), Jaca Book, Milan, 1998, p. 417).

Constricting Chest Pain

Participatory Democracy Poll

Syracuse Policetodeschini

..

Veritas No. 75 - February 2011

Pope

The Church is deeply tied to the person who is the foundation and that first to the task of transmitting the faith: the Holy Father. The Pope's role is so important that, according to St. Thomas, the mystery of iniquity of which Saint Paul speaks, alluding to the coming of the Antichrist, will not show until there is one who holds a and this person is Catholic Church with his boss, the Sovereign Pontiff ² .

Oggi stiamo vivendo una crisi nella Chiesa senza precedenti . Dall’ultimo concilio gravi errori sono insegnati e diffusi provocando una perdita generale della fede, della pratica religiosa e allo stesso tempo una laicizzazione di quella che era un tempo la società cristiana, come per esempio in Italia. I fatti mostrano che questa crisi è profondamente legata ai pontefici che sono stati a capo della Chiesa in quest’ultimo periodo. Paolo VI fu il papa che concluse il concilio, favorendone l’ala progressista e realizzando così ciò che il cardinal Suenens chiamò l’89 (la Rivoluzione francese) nella Chiesa, con la liberà religiosa, la collegialità episcopale e ecumenism. It was he who said: "We, well more than any other, we have the cult of man" ³ ! Under his pontificate was the dramatic change that transformed the liturgy of Catholic Mass in a Protestant ceremony in flavor, used by the pastors themselves to celebrate their dinner 4.

John Paul II set out the council in the application of his pontificate, in the light of ecumenism, which culminated with the meeting of representatives of all religions to Assisi, October 30, 1986. In the same line lies the papacy of Benedict XVI. After visits to the different inter-religious come quella alla Moschea Blu di Costantinopoli, dove lo si è visto scalzo e in preghiera, oppure quella alla sinagoga di Roma ove ha affermato che non si può essere contrari alla religione giudaica poiché preghiamo lo stesso Dio e l’Antica Alleanza è ancora in vigore, vuole adesso beatificare Giovanni Paolo II e commemorare il 25° anniversario della giornata di incontro delle religioni ad Assisi, il prossimo ottobre. Di fronte a questa crisi profonda quale deve essere l’attitudine di un cattolico che vuol conservare la fede, salvare la propria anima e lottare per la Chiesa?

Alcuni, considerando i gravi errori contro la fede insegnati in maniera esplicita o tramite le loro attitudini da tali pontefici giungono to say that they can not identify with the Vicar of Christ. A pope who is not acting normally for the good of the Church fulfilling its primary function of transmitting and keep the faith can not be the Vicar of Christ. According to this theory for years, the Church would have no visible head and any authority since popes, cardinals and bishops have all lost faith.

This way of thinking, especially when it is imposed as a new dogma of faith, instead of solving them puts insurmountable theological problems, notably on the divine and supernatural structure of the Church which can never be less because the beneficiary of the promise of the Savior: "The gates of hell shall not prevail against it " 5. Now the power of jurisdiction, namely government, is a constituent part of the Church and it will never be quite totally private. Another attitude is to take that Catholics formed in the traditional doctrine that even in the face of statements and actions clearly contrary to the faith, do not ever allow to detect the contradiction, but say nothing or try to justify at all costs, claims This compared to the Pope for what he represents, for fear of doing an injustice to his person, the Church or to a false understanding of what the papal infallibility. Such

way of acting is just as dangerous as, especially if you have teaching responsibilities, we should warn the faithful against the errors that can threaten the faith, especially when they are most harmful because preached by those in authority and mission teach the truth. The true Catholic attitude, which is taught by the whole tradition, is to preserve respect for authority, but at the same time, for the sake of justice for the faithful and of charity toward the one who errs, even if it is a superior, to denounce all that is in conflict with the faith and taught consistently defined. This, and not the defense di opinioni personali, è il criterio oggettivo a cui ogni cattolico deve conformare la propria vita. San Vincenzo di Lerino  lo riassumeva dicendo che dobbiamo credere fermamente e conformarci a ciò che è sempre stato creduto dovunque e da tutti  “Quod sempre, quod ubique quod ab omnibus” ⁶ .

La storia della Chiesa poi ci presente molti casi in cui un inferiore si oppone al superiore in virtù della fede, persino se si tratta del pontefice, pur riconoscendone l’autorità. San Paolo si permette di riprendere pubblicamente San Pietro che per un comportamento ambiguo rischiava di rimettere in questione l’insegnamento del Concilio di Gerusalemme sulla salvezza dei pagani. « Mi opposi a lui a viso aperto perché evidentemente aveva torto » ⁷ .

San Tommaso giustifica la sua attitudine con queste parole: «Se vi fosse pericolo per la fede, i superiori dovrebbero essere ripresi dagli inferiori , anche in pubblico . Così Paolo, che era sottomesso a Pietro, lo riprese per questo motivo» ⁸ .

In un altro passaggio, parlando dell’obbedienza, San Tommaso afferma che: «È detto negli Atti (6, 29): " Bisogna obbedire a Dio piuttosto che agli uomini ". Talvolta gli ordini dei superiori sono contrari a quelli di Dio, dunque non bisogna obbedire loro in tutto» ⁹ . Il Papa Vigilio fu richiamato all’ordine dal diacono Pelagio (VI sec.) a proposito del monotelismo; Bonifacio IV da San Colombano (VII sec); Onorio da San Sofronio di Gerusalemme (VII sec); e vi sono anche gli esempi di San Bruno (contro il Papa Pasquale II), di San Tommaso Becket (contro il Papa Alessandro III), di Santa Caterina da Siena (contro i Papi Gregorio XI e Urbano VI) ¹⁰ . Il  vero amore per l’autorità, quando essa devia dalla dottrina rivelata, è proprio la pubblica protesta, poiché in questi casi il silenzio diventa compiacente e non soltanto non contribuisce ad un ritorno alla Tradizione, ma conferma e appoggia nell’errore colui che lo professa.

Il voler tutto giustificare non è né un atto di giustizia nei confronti della verità rivelata, che non appartiene al Sommo Pontefice ma che egli deve trasmettere intatta; né un atto di carità perché, se la fede non è insegnata o peggio è contraddetta nei fatti da chi ha il dovere di predicarla, le anime sono scandalizzate e si perdono. La buona teologia permette di distinguere nel Pontefice, l’uomo, il dottore privato, o anche il Pontefice nel suo magistero chiamato semplicemente autentico, dal Vicario di Cristo che insegna nella pienezza della sua autorità per definire una verità di fede o di morale. Ciò permette di capire such as teaching or behavior of one who would confirm the faith, can sometimes be shaky or even in conflict with the faith 11.

The First Vatican Council, stating the conditions under which the Pope enjoys the charism of infallibility, it leaves open the possibility that outside of this divine assistance, there is the possibility of error. At the time of publication of his Jesus of Nazareth , Benedict XVI wrote in the preface: "Everyone is free to contradict me." His last book, Light of the World , is an 'interview and does not relate to the Magisterium. Of resto, egli stesso afferma che: «Naturalmente il Papa può avere delle opinioni private errate».

Il problema teologico dell’infallibilità è legato alla persona del pontefice e in particolare alla sua volontà. Egli può beneficiare di tale carisma quando vuole definire una dottrina intorno alla fede o alla morale, da tenersi  in tutta la Chiesa ¹² . I principi del liberalismo che sfociano nel modernismo portano a credere che non vi è una verità oggettiva. Quando un pontefice fonda la sua teologia su una filosofia idealista ed è influenzato dalle tesi moderniste sull’evoluzione del dogma, come può voler veramente definire in maniera irrevocabile una verità, that in his heart thought to be changing? Lefebvre, after one of his trips to Rome, stressing this point, we said that the Pope himself does not believe in his infallibility.

Even in the current situation we must have a deep faith in the divinity of the Church, in spite of his humanity that manifests itself dramatically in the person of the popes who have directed the last council. The rebirth of the Church of Rome and the Pope is why the first thought of every Catholic who loves the tradition must be in prayer today for the Vicar of Christ, for it to again "confirm his brethren" as Jesus said to St. Peter after him prophesied its triple denial 13. But this return and more than ever it is imperative to publicly denounce all that, but coming from Rome and the Pope is opposed to the faith that even the Pope will ever change.

Don Pierce Maria Petrucci

Heaviest White Rhinoceros

"The Son of man, when he returns, will still find faith on earth?" Reading this statement seems to not ...

" The Church does not have to worry about the conversion of the Jews, because we need to wait for the moment determined by God" when all has reached the kind of salvation "(Romans 11:25). On the contrary, the Jews are themselves living a sermon, which the Church to be linked, because recall Christ's Passion "..." Meanwhile, Israel - writes Ratzinger - retains its mission. Lies in the hands of God, who at the right time will save "all", when the number of the Gentiles will be complete .

South Park Episodes Streaming Subtitles

Credit, instability and risk assessment

of

Luciano Martinoli

luciano.martinoli @ gmail.com

was held yesterday, organized by Aletheia, a event entitled "Lending to companies in times of instability. We need a rethink in the criteria for risk assessment? "

Although Assolombarda was organized in the presence of contractors was poor and the theme seemed more aimed at banks who would benefit from this potential change of heart.

I thought it was a dialogue between a Chinese and a turkish, with the only level of communication provided by sign language that the two could be established.



L'immagine non è lontana dalla realtà in quanto non vi era cattiva volontà di comunicare, ma reale impossibilità di farlo. Da un lato gli imprenditori (solo uno a capo di un'associazione) che, con la foga e l'entusiasmo tipico di chi fa impresa, ha illustrato le speranze, i progetti, le eccellenze, ma anche le necessità della categoria. Dall'altro i bancari che dissertavano sulla validità e necessità degli "schemi" (il rating) da adottare per capire il mondo dei loro interlocutori.
Solo nel pomeriggio è balzato chiaro il nocciolo del problema, additato da uno dei relatori: le banche non sono sempre attrezzate per valutare le strategie d'impresa.


The rating is in fact an algorithmic tool useful to try to figure out a pattern on a numerical basis from the accounts (the past). The strategy however is not numeric, can not be calculated and reduced to a figure, but it can also be reported. How many things we do with humans, without ambiguity and that allow us to make effective decisions, without resorting to math?
Here then is the need not for a rethinking of the ratings, and even new rating, but a radical overcoming them: the use of a new language that allows to communicate effectively, accurately and quickly enough, the strategy.

not hide behind a play of words, called "language" that can then be rated, but a very different approach. With the language you dialogue, a dialogue we can understand , include more than answers to give you allow to perform an operation critical to the construction of development: ask questions. A rating, a computer program that expects input, and only those, and produces output, and only those, only gives answers, answers to questions already asked and crystallized in the program. E 'questions that might arise from new perspectives of incentive for both parties and only if the bank, but the company will exceed the logic of the customer / supplier and equip with modern tools of effective communication strategies achieving this goal.
This language exists, therefore there is no excuse if you do not wish to support a role play an anachronism that is ending its life cycle.

Free Printable Vintage Ads

Porter and capitalism to be reinvented to change

of

Luciano Martinoli

luciano.martinoli @ gmail.com

latest issue of Harvard Business Review Italy is an comment to ' article by Michael Porter that provides an analysis and proposes solutions regarding the current crisis of capitalism. If the analysis can be agreed, the proposals depart from a viewpoint that is the real cause of the crisis. Carry the full text, which deals with

companies, says Porter, they must take steps to reconcile business and society and the way to go is to "creating shared value." ... The solution to the shared value that involves the creation of economic value is done in ways that create value for the company but also for society, responding to the needs of the time and the demands of a social nature.

The picture one gets from this statement is as follows: on the one hand there is the business world, companies, markets, finance, etc.., by another, completely detached, the real world, people, society, nature and its resources, etc..

's rare to find in a false belief that human history has produced the most devastating effects.

As if the world of business was on a planet, and the same people who work there and dwell on another one!

Who will buy the products and services that firms produce only those who are the company that wants to "exploit"? How is it conceivable that the business can thrive in an environment depleted?

The positions of Porter, and many like him, sound like the curse of the dog that licks the file of a book by Erri De Luca ( Montedidio ): "... the dog licking file is licking his blood, but he likes most of the pain and continues to bleed "

Today the business world is nourished by his own blood!

This situation is not only unacceptable but also unreal and perpetuate it will only create disaster even worse than those to which we have witnessed.

The company, born from the desire of an entrepreneur who wanted to create something that was not there, has always been "embodied" in a social context real (people are not virtual, then living in a specific place and only in the world and the outbreak of localism is their cry of protest) and has never suffered problems in which we speak (and even social responsibility as it has always been "integrated" firm action in its social dimension). An example of this, just to name a few emblematic, is supported by some car manufacturers whose founders wanted to show their presence in a proper place names: FIAT means Italian Automobile Factory TORINO, ALFA ROMEO Anonima Lombarda Fabbrica Automobili Mr. Romeo BMW Bayerische Motoren Werke, in Italian Factory BAVARIAN Engines, ...

So the "sin" of capitalism is derived from its context real and the solution is not a continuation of this state with an attempt at reconciliation with it, but on re-immersion in the real world, one where there are places with their cultures, people with their needs and their capabilities, nature with its delicate balance and its beauty, that is, the places where those who support this nonsense, once you leave the office (at the factory would not dream of supporting such nonsense) is pleased to immergercisi ... with his family.

Why is human too!

Luciano Martinoli

Is Pooping More A Sign Of Pregnancy

Neurodeliri

I think about it for a while 'I do it more and more I am convinced that the era of Web 2.0, has run Féisbuc ate \u200b\u200bit all and is stoned a lot of people who do not belong to the digital generation that knows how to use all' ste robe (I included).

Once there were blogs and myspace. The first was for those who wanted to communicate through words, the latter for those who want to do it with images, videos and more. The first were simple, clean, the latter a bit 'messy but creative, and often exaggerated tamarri.

should be noted that, with a little effort, both instruments were customized and that was enough to learn how to insert a few lines of code in the template html to get results a certain level. Personally, being a lazy from international competition, I never did and I'm decently satisfied with what I was made available, at least until the arrival of Féisbuc.

I do not remember who invited me to use it, but I remember distinctly that I received an email in which the current unknown (or unknown) advised me to try it. It is now several years that abuse and I passed all the stages of addiction, but now, finally, I feel very strong desire to get rid of it at least in part.

I do not want to quibble about the value of social networks, but I think that, in principle, can make sense in America, a country where people move more, the distances are huge and where contacts with "friends" get lost easily. For us it is an unnecessary terrifying. This is not necessarily a bad thing because as I read somewhere, "the total uselessness in its free innocent, it's really hard to get to, and when it happens, it produces beauty." Ok. Points of view. But art itself is useless. E Bella (Twilight not demented). FB

its usefulness has it and is certainly not about getting in touch with people that if you if you missed the street, there must be a reason the state. Also because with people who regularly attend one feels by phone or by mail at most as it was once. NOTE: "once" I mean 2003, not 1000 years ago ...

FB In the pre-Internet stuff was interesting after all. It is "surfing, you look for information, you fools discovered sites and wonderful, you run into such phenomena as Rotten.com or nell'Hokuto Audiotec (RIP) that allows you to put on the phone Abadantuono version of Attila, they tried free porn ( followed by a piece on YouPorn) and ICQ chat with web ... But that is today called "uber old" also allows you to build a representation of self, identity choice and assembled by the user. It matters little that it was phony or real, but ... I always thought those were more interesting because you think artificial, constructed, narrated, because behind the fact that one said to be world champion "snookerina Breton" (fuck-that I invented yet) had a brain work, as short and buggy.

FB, however, is the total nullification of creativity and the glorification of laziness. We find links that identify our emotional state, quotations, cartoons, photos, pictures, games of all kinds, all without sail, without going to try anything, or even worse, without creating anything of our own. The best effort is going on YouTube, but if a friend of ours has posted what interests us, is not even necessary, just share it from him ... and then you quit more FBs, no longer used the Net

All this, I think, is quite disheartening because the Internet has taught something to someone, is that it is a huge space in which to express a total and absolute freedom, unless you're not Chinese. Ok, seen in context that there are around a lot ': unless you're not Chinese and you live in China. Frankly, I find it very creative my posts from the supermarket and I very much appreciate the opportunity to share them instantly by generating a reaction, ma penso anche che questo sovraccarico di informazioni assolutamente inutili come le mie foto a Hello-aiuto-è-proprio-ovunque-Kitty, non valga un cazzo e che sia un assoluto nulla in espansione di “funzione fatica” – vedi le teorie sulla comunicazione del linguista Jakobson.

Insomma, parlo anche se non ho una beata da dire e lo faccio solo per affermare la mia presenza, tenere vivo un contatto. Visto che oggi ho mangiato semplice (panino con la bologna) mi viene un dubbio feroce: non è che FB è cresciuto così tanto perché consente di controllare le persone? Ok, sul Corriere di oggi c’è un articolo nel quale si dice che i detenuti di Napoli comunicano con l’esterno grazie a delle pagine FB and so it is clear that the control is not absolute, but the profiling is real, just look at the ads ...

Before I get engaged, for example, on my page was advertising for a cartload pussy, now insist on sell me the terrifying kimono with flowers. Got to do something? I do not know if you read and ask questions, remember the title of this post.

in favor of the control theory I found, among many other crap I read about FB, even those who argue that the statistics they see the traffic of FB than porn sites, that social networks are a new instrument of control and repression, as a specie di bromuro virtuale. A me sembra una stronzata grossa come la piramide di Cheope che si spiega da sola.

Detto questo, ho il dubbio che il mio amico Enfisema abbia fatto benissimo a non aprire un profilo.

Detto questo, linko il post a FB.

Ma lo faccio da FUORI, per leggerlo sei uscito da FB, occhio a non prendere freddo.