Si può dire qualcosa di nuovo e di risolutivo, ma tristemente! Tristemente perché questo qualcosa di nuovo e di risolutivo non is acceptable. Since neither of the two ruling classes who are opposed: the Fiat management, and union leaders.
But because something new and resolution must be acceptable? Because, to use it, need knowledge and methods that are not in the availability of the ruling classes. And the current ruling elites can not admit that there is some method or knowledge essential to carry out their duties, which are not in their availability. Not if the manager can afford to boast that Promethean his exceptional gifts (gift of God) and to assert its uniqueness and indispensability. Not if you can afford the union rights defender that managers are happy, stimulated by azionisti avidi, vuole calpestare. E siano botte da orbi, figurate ovviamente, si spera.
Ma quali conoscenze e metodi “sconosciuti” alle parti in causa servirebbero? Be’, … servirebbe conoscere la meccanica quantistica e la teoria dei sistemi auto poietici. Queste “teorie” permettono di capire da dove vengono le resistenze al cambiamento. E servirebbero i metodi che da esse si possono ricavare per capire come attivare e gestire diversamente i processi di cambiamento. Mi immagino l’incredulità del lettore: conoscenze e metodi potrebbero impostare diversamente il problema di Pomigliano? La mia risposta è sì! Potrebbero, addirittura, trasformarlo in una opportunità di rivoluzione del mercato dell’auto.
Ma non perdiamoci in ciance e vediamo di provare ugualmente ad indicare cosa davvero si può dire di nuovo (speriamo di sbagliarmi quando penso che sia inascoltabile) sull’ “Affair Pomigliano”.
Innanzitutto è importante osservare che non si può risolvere un conflitto dando ragione ad una delle due parti. O avviando un negoziato estenuante dove, alla fine, il risultato è un accordo al ribasso nel quale ciascuna delle parti rinuncia a qualcosa che ritiene vitale. E non vede l’ora di trovare una occasione per ridiscutere il compromesso che giudica, forse inevitabile, ma ingiusto. Si risolve il conflitto superando ambedue le posizioni e costruendo una sintesi che must go beyond the hopes and dreams (because they all have hopes and dreams) brighter.
But is it really possible to overcome the current positions? Not only possible, but it is only right to do so because they are both daughters of a world that no longer exists. Yes even those of FIAT which seems technically unassailable ...
In fact, Fiat is using what I believe we can call "Officer Managerial Ideology". It sounds something like this.
What are the operators in a manufacturing company? What the heck: a servant to "operate". That is to manufacture. In the specific case: to build cars. And the market
the car as is? But it is characterized by global competition and tough. So much so that the world will survive in the near future, only a few global manufacturers: those that will produce better. And there is a better method to produce only as "World Class Manufacturing".
Well, if we start from these assumptions, that is, if one accepts the IMU (and yes, Managerial Ideology Official) is not a cave spider hole. There's nothing to do. Operators Pomigliano can only accept the agreement proposed by the FIAT FIAT because you can not afford any other agreement.
And trade unionists? Be 'more trade unionists are "hard and pure, "the more that can not groped to rebel, even if this rebellion appears unreasonable. At a managerial official ideology is opposed to the official trade union ideology. And the two ideologies inevitably collide. And clashing reinforcing: the current Rossini crescendo of conflict.
Fortunately, the two ideologies that clash can be overcome. The ISU does not live a moment of glory. E 'forced to hole up in an antagonistic position to the bitter end that seems very abstract to the' worker (Pasquale Amendola, as reported by Mariano Maugeri on Sun Sunday, June 30) now takes 800 Euro with the IGC and, tomorrow, returning to work and 120 hours of overtime, it would take 1800.
By now seems not only winning, but the only possible IMU.
Then we start to see why this is necessary to overcome it and how to overcome. A first observation of a general nature, is that no ideology (single thought, inevitable, etc..) Can have a monopoly on reality. And then you must make a second less general, but more relevant. When the market in some form is any single way of thinking, this is the moment in which will create an outrageous thought that sbaraglierà the market.
It 's more than thirty years, this dynamic is evident from the blow followed when taking IMB l’ideologia unica dell’informatica centralizzata. Senza rendersi conto che essa poteva (doveva) essere superata come doveva essere inevitabilmente superata la visione del mondo gerarchica che la sosteneva. Favore di una società, di imprese, meno gerarchiche e più reticolari.
Partendo da queste osservazioni, che ci mettono in guardia da tutte le ideologie, comprese quelle strategiche, rileggiamo criticamente la IMU.
Il mercato dell’auto è così competitivo perché tutti credono che il ruolo funzionale e sociale dell’automobile non possa cambiare. In sostanza tutti sembrano credere che la civiltà umana è arrivata, per quanto riguarda il trasporto individuale, alla fine della sua evolution: we have learned to be desired, build and use this type of car this way and we will do so until the end of time. Or shutting down of the sun. Or, more likely, the exhaustion of oil.
Today it is only right to begin to imagine a new use and a new sense of personal transport and the car which is the main instrument. If you leave the old ideology of the car, then you begin to design a completely new car. And the competition is trivially avoided: the others to remain "leticia" do better in the car have less meaning and, therefore, will be sold and paid less and less.
But Fiat has begun a process innovation in the car to do, I can argue. I believe, however, that we have only paid attention to technological innovation (eg innovation in engines that consume less and pollute less, why). It has tried a unique stylistic innovation "strong" with the '500 that Riccardo Ruggeri (Author of the beautiful, though still too full of IMU, booklet titled "Word of Marchionne) has called" a post-modern subject, conceived from birth to be a cult "(p. 97). But a post-modern subject has the lightness of the post-modern does not propose much less actualized new meanings and styles of living. The new '500 is only in memory similar to the old ‘500 che, quella sì, nel bene e nel male, è stata capace di allevare una nuova società.
Detto diversamente: con la tecnologia e lo stile non si rivoluziona il mercato. Si respira qualche boccata d’aria fresca nell’atmosfera mefitica della competizione, ma non gli si sfugge, né si riesce a domarne la continua escalation che porta a dover vivere in un ambiente di business di irragionevole durezza.
Ma come è possibile rivoluzionare il mercato? Trovare un sistema di prodotti (un sistema, non uno solo) che possa essere il simbolo di una società prossima ventura, migliore di quella attuale? Come hanno fatto tutti gli imprenditori di successo.
Anche qui la IMU si intromette e pretende suggest the road. FIAT should enlist the throngs of market researchers to understand how the car is and its significance in the future. And then, a host of creative, the most "strange" and possible alternatives. M in his suggestion that the IMU has not been heard.
No car company has started strongly this research project. The research has been and remains essentially technological, and only instrumentally, socially. This challenge of the search for new meaning, new function and, therefore, the new structure to the car could have been started decades ago. We recognize, then, at least delays strategic.
What other way to innovate is now possible?
And here comes in the figure of the dance. To design a social and non-technological innovation is necessary to delegate this task to technologists, sociologists and market researchers, but to actors who, appropriately trained and assisted by technologists, sociologists and market researchers can more easily bind to the depths of society for build the new way of making cars.
who lives deep inside the belly of society (and in the case of the Fiat company of half the world) are just the operators. It is to them that, properly trained and guided, Fiat should give play to the company's processes and deep sense of redesign and functionality of the car.
Con altre parole, la cosa nuova da dire è che si può e si deve reimpostare il problema strategico.
Non si tratta di competere, seguendo leggi competitive, auto costruite a causa della mancanza di coraggio progettuale. Leggi competitive che causano guai che si aggraveranno senza soluzione di continuità. Tutti sanno che due anni fa si è già tentata una rivoluzione. Si è chiuso per due mesi lo stabilimento, si sono avviate attività di ristrutturazione fisica e di formazione delle persone che è costato poco più di 100 milioni. Ma sembra che i risultati non siano bastati. Oggi è necessario un ulteriore inasprimento della qualità della vita e del lavoro che costerà 700 milioni. Sarà la “soluzione finale”, the final investment? Of course not! Soon it will take a further course because competitors will not stand still. And so, following the dictates of the IMU (Managerial Ideology Journal) you start on a journey that will become every day more difficult. Also because the desire for a new type of individual transport and new tools to make it make it increasingly less attractive car manufacturers still believe that the tools of self-realization. Or worship.
is to invent a new sense of self and a new feature in the third millennium. And this sense can be discovered, constructed, designed only by workers who live in the belly of society. So set
the strategic problem is no longer a problem but an opportunity. An opportunity to start building full of items at value of existing cars. Made by the same people who have inspired the design.
But how do you achieve this dream? Here comes the new knowledge and new methods. Through them you can really transform an executive class in a class project and then realized that before. And the ruling class in a class that is capable of guiding the design process and social construction. That go well beyond the instrumental contribution of World Class manufacturing processes.
is not looking for the best of all worlds. It is about really a solution to the problem of industrial systems that have been stuffed into conflict without resolution.
It is profoundly transform with a new alliance between the ruling classes and working classes are radically different.
Here should be added a further discussion. But the only hint that would lead us too far: the relationship with nature. It is certainly not resolved by non-polluting engines. If you try to spread among all the 6 / 7 billion people the same density of self that exists in Western society we would be faced with insurmountable limits: for example the raw materials to build the spaces where her travel with the fuel in them work. Then a revolution in the design of transport individual and the tools to realize it is not only urgent to avoid a devastating competition, but for serious reasons, natural and social.
course to follow a road of this type are not Promethean nor managers nor union conflict. But the current manager will be able to become activators Promethean design processes and the social construction? Will the current conflict unions to participate in the coordination efforts of design and construction of the operative classes. For posterity will judge?
Pending that posterity will pronounce to all of us a responsibility to try to walk along this road.
For our part, we make available to all new knowledge and new methods which are the club for travelers who want to travel this road (unavoidable) to a new company.
0 comments:
Post a Comment