Luna Lovegood Lion Hat For Sale

You can say something new about Pomigliano?

Si può dire qualcosa di nuovo e di risolutivo, ma tristemente! Tristemente perché questo qualcosa di nuovo e di risolutivo non is acceptable. Since neither of the two ruling classes who are opposed: the Fiat management, and union leaders.
But because something new and resolution must be acceptable? Because, to use it, need knowledge and methods that are not in the availability of the ruling classes. And the current ruling elites can not admit that there is some method or knowledge essential to carry out their duties, which are not in their availability. Not if the manager can afford to boast that Promethean his exceptional gifts (gift of God) and to assert its uniqueness and indispensability. Not if you can afford the union rights defender that managers are happy, stimulated by azionisti avidi, vuole calpestare. E siano botte da orbi, figurate ovviamente, si spera.

Ma quali conoscenze e metodi “sconosciuti” alle parti in causa servirebbero? Be’, … servirebbe conoscere la meccanica quantistica e la teoria dei sistemi auto poietici. Queste “teorie” permettono di capire da dove vengono le resistenze al cambiamento. E servirebbero i metodi che da esse si possono ricavare per capire come attivare e gestire diversamente i processi di cambiamento. Mi immagino l’incredulità del lettore: conoscenze e metodi potrebbero impostare diversamente il problema di Pomigliano? La mia risposta è sì! Potrebbero, addirittura, trasformarlo in una opportunità di rivoluzione del mercato dell’auto.

Ma non perdiamoci in ciance e vediamo di provare ugualmente ad indicare cosa davvero si può dire di nuovo (speriamo di sbagliarmi quando penso che sia inascoltabile) sull’ “Affair Pomigliano”.
Innanzitutto è importante osservare che non si può risolvere un conflitto dando ragione ad una delle due parti. O avviando un negoziato estenuante dove, alla fine, il risultato è un accordo al ribasso nel quale ciascuna delle parti rinuncia a qualcosa che ritiene vitale. E non vede l’ora di trovare una occasione per ridiscutere il compromesso che giudica, forse inevitabile, ma ingiusto. Si risolve il conflitto superando ambedue le posizioni e costruendo una sintesi che must go beyond the hopes and dreams (because they all have hopes and dreams) brighter.

But is it really possible to overcome the current positions? Not only possible, but it is only right to do so because they are both daughters of a world that no longer exists. Yes even those of FIAT which seems technically unassailable ...
In fact, Fiat is using what I believe we can call "Officer Managerial Ideology". It sounds something like this.

What are the operators in a manufacturing company? What the heck: a servant to "operate". That is to manufacture. In the specific case: to build cars. And the market
the car as is? But it is characterized by global competition and tough. So much so that the world will survive in the near future, only a few global manufacturers: those that will produce better. And there is a better method to produce only as "World Class Manufacturing".

Well, if we start from these assumptions, that is, if one accepts the IMU (and yes, Managerial Ideology Official) is not a cave spider hole. There's nothing to do. Operators Pomigliano can only accept the agreement proposed by the FIAT FIAT because you can not afford any other agreement.

And trade unionists? Be 'more trade unionists are "hard and pure, "the more that can not groped to rebel, even if this rebellion appears unreasonable. At a managerial official ideology is opposed to the official trade union ideology. And the two ideologies inevitably collide. And clashing reinforcing: the current Rossini crescendo of conflict.
Fortunately, the two ideologies that clash can be overcome. The ISU does not live a moment of glory. E 'forced to hole up in an antagonistic position to the bitter end that seems very abstract to the' worker (Pasquale Amendola, as reported by Mariano Maugeri on Sun Sunday, June 30) now takes 800 Euro with the IGC and, tomorrow, returning to work and 120 hours of overtime, it would take 1800.
By now seems not only winning, but the only possible IMU.

Then we start to see why this is necessary to overcome it and how to overcome. A first observation of a general nature, is that no ideology (single thought, inevitable, etc..) Can have a monopoly on reality. And then you must make a second less general, but more relevant. When the market in some form is any single way of thinking, this is the moment in which will create an outrageous thought that sbaraglierà the market.

It 's more than thirty years, this dynamic is evident from the blow followed when taking IMB l’ideologia unica dell’informatica centralizzata. Senza rendersi conto che essa poteva (doveva) essere superata come doveva essere inevitabilmente superata la visione del mondo gerarchica che la sosteneva. Favore di una società, di imprese, meno gerarchiche e più reticolari.

Partendo da queste osservazioni, che ci mettono in guardia da tutte le ideologie, comprese quelle strategiche, rileggiamo criticamente la IMU.

Il mercato dell’auto è così competitivo perché tutti credono che il ruolo funzionale e sociale dell’automobile non possa cambiare. In sostanza tutti sembrano credere che la civiltà umana è arrivata, per quanto riguarda il trasporto individuale, alla fine della sua evolution: we have learned to be desired, build and use this type of car this way and we will do so until the end of time. Or shutting down of the sun. Or, more likely, the exhaustion of oil.

Today it is only right to begin to imagine a new use and a new sense of personal transport and the car which is the main instrument. If you leave the old ideology of the car, then you begin to design a completely new car. And the competition is trivially avoided: the others to remain "leticia" do better in the car have less meaning and, therefore, will be sold and paid less and less.
But Fiat has begun a process innovation in the car to do, I can argue. I believe, however, that we have only paid attention to technological innovation (eg innovation in engines that consume less and pollute less, why). It has tried a unique stylistic innovation "strong" with the '500 that Riccardo Ruggeri (Author of the beautiful, though still too full of IMU, booklet titled "Word of Marchionne) has called" a post-modern subject, conceived from birth to be a cult "(p. 97). But a post-modern subject has the lightness of the post-modern does not propose much less actualized new meanings and styles of living. The new '500 is only in memory similar to the old ‘500 che, quella sì, nel bene e nel male, è stata capace di allevare una nuova società.
Detto diversamente: con la tecnologia e lo stile non si rivoluziona il mercato. Si respira qualche boccata d’aria fresca nell’atmosfera mefitica della competizione, ma non gli si sfugge, né si riesce a domarne la continua escalation che porta a dover vivere in un ambiente di business di irragionevole durezza.

Ma come è possibile rivoluzionare il mercato? Trovare un sistema di prodotti (un sistema, non uno solo) che possa essere il simbolo di una società prossima ventura, migliore di quella attuale? Come hanno fatto tutti gli imprenditori di successo.

Anche qui la IMU si intromette e pretende suggest the road. FIAT should enlist the throngs of market researchers to understand how the car is and its significance in the future. And then, a host of creative, the most "strange" and possible alternatives. M in his suggestion that the IMU has not been heard.
No car company has started strongly this research project. The research has been and remains essentially technological, and only instrumentally, socially. This challenge of the search for new meaning, new function and, therefore, the new structure to the car could have been started decades ago. We recognize, then, at least delays strategic.
What other way to innovate is now possible?
And here comes in the figure of the dance. To design a social and non-technological innovation is necessary to delegate this task to technologists, sociologists and market researchers, but to actors who, appropriately trained and assisted by technologists, sociologists and market researchers can more easily bind to the depths of society for build the new way of making cars.
who lives deep inside the belly of society (and in the case of the Fiat company of half the world) are just the operators. It is to them that, properly trained and guided, Fiat should give play to the company's processes and deep sense of redesign and functionality of the car.
Con altre parole, la cosa nuova da dire è che si può e si deve reimpostare il problema strategico.
Non si tratta di competere, seguendo leggi competitive, auto costruite a causa della mancanza di coraggio progettuale. Leggi competitive che causano guai che si aggraveranno senza soluzione di continuità. Tutti sanno che due anni fa si è già tentata una rivoluzione. Si è chiuso per due mesi lo stabilimento, si sono avviate attività di ristrutturazione fisica e di formazione delle persone che è costato poco più di 100 milioni. Ma sembra che i risultati non siano bastati. Oggi è necessario un ulteriore inasprimento della qualità della vita e del lavoro che costerà 700 milioni. Sarà la “soluzione finale”, the final investment? Of course not! Soon it will take a further course because competitors will not stand still. And so, following the dictates of the IMU (Managerial Ideology Journal) you start on a journey that will become every day more difficult. Also because the desire for a new type of individual transport and new tools to make it make it increasingly less attractive car manufacturers still believe that the tools of self-realization. Or worship.
is to invent a new sense of self and a new feature in the third millennium. And this sense can be discovered, constructed, designed only by workers who live in the belly of society. So set
the strategic problem is no longer a problem but an opportunity. An opportunity to start building full of items at value of existing cars. Made by the same people who have inspired the design.
But how do you achieve this dream? Here comes the new knowledge and new methods. Through them you can really transform an executive class in a class project and then realized that before. And the ruling class in a class that is capable of guiding the design process and social construction. That go well beyond the instrumental contribution of World Class manufacturing processes.
is not looking for the best of all worlds. It is about really a solution to the problem of industrial systems that have been stuffed into conflict without resolution.
It is profoundly transform with a new alliance between the ruling classes and working classes are radically different.
Here should be added a further discussion. But the only hint that would lead us too far: the relationship with nature. It is certainly not resolved by non-polluting engines. If you try to spread among all the 6 / 7 billion people the same density of self that exists in Western society we would be faced with insurmountable limits: for example the raw materials to build the spaces where her travel with the fuel in them work. Then a revolution in the design of transport individual and the tools to realize it is not only urgent to avoid a devastating competition, but for serious reasons, natural and social.
course to follow a road of this type are not Promethean nor managers nor union conflict. But the current manager will be able to become activators Promethean design processes and the social construction? Will the current conflict unions to participate in the coordination efforts of design and construction of the operative classes. For posterity will judge?

Pending that posterity will pronounce to all of us a responsibility to try to walk along this road.
For our part, we make available to all new knowledge and new methods which are the club for travelers who want to travel this road (unavoidable) to a new company.

Strawberry Fields Psych Test

Entrepreneurship Competition or increased? Interview

Francesco Zanotti

We try to decline the word "growth". So we have a reference. I like that he was referring to an ethical and aesthetic development. But even this expression requires a specification, that is to say what's inside.
And then we accept for a moment to use the word growth. Growth of what? Certainly not the number of shoes that are in the availability of every citizen of advanced societies. What then? Let's say the following ... Alt, brackets necessary: \u200b\u200beach proposal is un rischio. Perché oggi vige il principio della auto rappresentazione negativa. “Dalli all’idea”, sembra essere la strategia dominante. Appena una idea nasce, ecco che mille intellettuali, giornalisti et alia si scagliano contro questa idea. Credo sia il momento di cambiare registro. Credo che di fronte ad una idea, si possa certamente dire che è sbagliata, ma chi lo dice, credo, debba prendersi l’impegno di aggiungere una sua idea in alternativa. Poi può accadere che le idee non siano tutte sbagliate, ma abbiano bisogno di chiarimenti, completamenti, integrazioni. Ed allora si organizza un processo di creazione sociale di conoscenza e realtà che è l’unico che può creare crescita, sviluppo … chiamatelo come volete …

Diamo finalmente un contenuto a crescita … Credo che occorra aumentare non solo la quantità, ma anche la qualità dell’occupazione (più soldi e lavori più capaci di essere occasione di autorealizzazione). Aumentare la qualità dell’occupazione, intesa nel modo che abbiamo specificato, significa anche aumentare la qualità della conoscenza e la qualità della natura. Significa iniziare a fare del binomio natura e società un’opera d’arte complessiva …
Più qualità dell’occupazione, quindi. Bene, ora vediamo come si propone di realizzarla.
Massimo Mucchetti sul Corriere Economia di oggi (lunedì 14 giugno 2010) sostiene che il motore della crescita è la concorrenza. Soprattutto nei settori dell’energia, delle telecomunicazioni etc. Non basta creare un habitat giuridico, fiscale culturale e finanziario per la crescita del mondo delle partite IVA o delle PMI.

Francesco Giavazzi sul Corriere della sera, sempre di oggi, sostiene qualcosa di analogo, ma usa la metafora delle liberalizzazioni.

A me sembra che ambedue i commentatori propugnino strategie dall’alto. Mucchetti mi sembra che sia anche un po’ conservatore perché egli immagina che basti rivitalizzare, attraverso la concorrenza, le imprese che ci sono attualmente.
Noi stiamo intervistando qualche imprenditore per provare a stimolare un processo Discussion and planning from the bottom. The comments that are emerging, albeit slowly, are of two types. The first is an absolute lack of confidence in any solution to the top. Both for their lack of incisiveness that likely to happen in good time. How many years Francesco Giavazzi (in good company) offers his recipe for liberalization? If it is not applied is not a solution. I will excuse the pun: If not applicable, not applicable.

The second point is this. But suppose also that we can make all the reforms (including competition) desirable, is becoming increasingly clear that the basic problem is that you need redesign from scratch the entrepreneurial system and the society around him. There are products and production and distribution systems radically different from those present. For the simple reason that men are tired of those present and the nature does not support them anymore.
E 'necessary in short, a new era of entrepreneurship profound, entrepreneurship that we have defined "increased" to indicate that planning must be exercised in a society much more complex than before and a nature that is in severe distress. How to turn this
entrepreneurship? The keyword method. Instead of competition and deregulation (ok .. beside ..) method. Method? Yes A system of methodologies for understanding, at the level of each company, what has been completed and if you revive its life cycle. To understand the same thing at the level of individual industries. In order to design new small businesses that are not only proposals for small technological innovations which today seem to want to entrust all hope.

A small conclusion: the politics of research. Also on today's Corriere Edoardo Boncinelli looks at the genetic research. It reveals that the last ten years have revealed the need for a new paradigm of analysis and understanding of the biological because the big promises made flow around the year 2000 did not materialize. It 'a veiled criticism of the sensationalism genetico degli ultimi dieci anni. E’ una critica che poteva già essere fatta dieci anni fa perché già allora era evidente che si stava seguendo un modello riduzionista che non poteva avere successo. Conclusione? Una nuova imprenditorialità aumentata anche nella ricerca scientifica.

How To Fix A Throttle Cable On A Gas Scooter

Rinaldo Novati of Mirex

Di seguito riportiamo un estratto (versione integrale) della seconda intervista del progetto di ricerca "Il futuro del sistema imprenditoriale italiano" al dott. Novati di Mirex . Si rimanda all’allegato per la versione integrale.

“A nostro avviso l’imprenditore non necessariamente deve avere 1.000 idee, ne bastano poche ma che siano tutte rigorosamente chiare, prima fra all the profits. And on that basis to see how to optimize resources, revenues and so on. I do not believe in methods or special knowledge, that laws on the books is a story of everyday life is another: we need experience, which accumulates with time and undoubted ability. I also attended specialized courses at the Bocconi University and I have cultivated the deep conviction that these eminent professors know in detail all the swimming styles but with the small detail that they have learned on the beach, while we have learned what 's I have done in deep water, where you do not touch. "

R. Novati

Itchy Rash Outer Thigh

research project "The future of the Italian entrepreneurial system" - Interview with Dr. Cannavale -

We believe that we live a crisis operation and try to overcome it by adopting strategies to improve the existent. We are instead faced with a crisis entire ecology of "meaning." To overcome it is necessary to abandon any temptation to turn and conservation efforts, intense and widespread use of design at all levels of our society.

To help launch a new era of entrepreneurship , that it seems fair to define
"increased", we decided to start an event planning systemic absolutely new: the involvement of all the Italian ruling class in an explicit commitment di riprogettazione
dell’universo industriale, economico, finanziario, sociale, politico, istituzionale .

Esso ha inizio con una serie di interviste alle elite imprenditoriali, politiche, istituzionali e culturali di questo nostro Paese.

Di seguito riportiamo una sintesi della prima intervista al dott. Fabio Cannavale di Bravofly . Si rimanda all’allegato per la versione integrale .

“In qualità di imprenditore investo in settori che abbiano un alto potenziale di redditività sia in Italia che in generale in Europa. Nel 99’ ero consulente McKinsey e in molti ci siamo resi conto di come Internet fosse il futuro: alcuni hanno fatto un fondo su internet altri si sono lanciati nell’ e-commerce. Bravofly è nata proprio con l’idea di entrare nel campo dell’e-commerce nel travel, da sempre il settore favorito in Italia per ragioni storiche e logistiche. Dapprima con alcuni ex colleghi sono entrato nella compagine azionaria di eDreams e, dopo aver venduto le quote, ho creato nel 2004 Volagratis con Marco Corradino, che avevo incontrato proprio nell’esperienza eDreams. La Net Partner di Boni e Appendino, invece, di cui io sono socio, ha esordito come fondo internet ed è arrivata a quotare in borsa sia Yoox che Mutui on-line.

L’Italia è un po’ indietro con l’e-commerce rispetto al resto Europe, but I'm sure that in future we will reach European levels, because there are basic structural problems. In terms of business model, there are big differences between Italy and the rest of Europe, especially with regard to flights. The only difference is that there is in the travel and tour operators: the only sector in which Italy is really back.

regard to education, play Italy in the small American model: the best brains in the center to the north and south are still there. The challenge is to give conditions to allow these people to return home, but being able to express. Another common phenomenon is that many Italians go to work in London or the United States. If we do not have a system that selects the talent, the other countries attract the best of our resources.

In most developed countries there is an academic system that works. The current trend in the United States is not specialization. They have a multicultural system, develop many interesting topics within the university in collaboration with large corporations. It 's a typical behavior of the Italians parceled out.

It 's a fact that in Italy is an ongoing exchange industry. I hear "If, however, after no longer produced? A nation can not be maintained on the service sector. " In my opinion this statement is wrong. Take for example the United States: the first two industries are the software and film.
In Italy there is already a first industrial revolution. The dismantling of the industrial system is a process that is already happening and not in a way so traumatic.
What should Italy are strategic projects, such as in infrastructure.

Moreover in a world that is changing and is increasingly focused on new technologies, the real strategic asset is the people. I have a very innovative company in the business of insurance, holidays and restaurants. The value of the fund is to provide a modern solution to the end customer and this type of skills are in Italy, where there are two good universities, and where people are on average brighter. On mobile phones are the world leaders, on Facebook we have the highest penetration in the world than the United States.
We have established the "First-generation network," which is an informal network to exchange ideas and information to support young entrepreneurs.

In Italy there is an important cultural fact and demagogic: average people do not realize how Asia is economically and technologically advanced. The epicenter of the world is now Asia, but there is awareness and forms of racism that persist on our part.

All’università ho frequentato anche gruppi politici, al loro interno c’erano le persone meno brillanti che conoscevo. Tutte le persone ad alto potenziale sono diventati dirigenti d’azienda. C’è una forte dicotomia tra politica, istituzioni e mondo economico al meno per quanto riguarda la mia generazione e il centro nord, ovviamente salvo eccezioni. Gente di basso valore fa andare male un’azienda come un partito politico.”

Fabio Cannavale